THE LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

 Who said there was no life on Mars?

LT, 29 Mar 2007

Who said there was no life on Mars? Croatian PM Ivo Sanader has just fallen from there and comments the newest developments regarding the Hague accusations against Croatian generals and Croatia (The Storm). 

Asked what he thinks about the transcripts tinted in Croatian presidential office, which are being used as the main “evidence” to prove a “criminal enterprise” of Croatia (and that of General Ante Gotovina among others) for re-taking 1/3 of the occupied Croatian territory, the big theater boy Sanader won’t actually comment, he will just take the credit for Croatia's freedom:

“I won’t comment this newest development of the events [that Croatian presidential transcripts are used as the evidence against Croatian generals in The Hague], but in any case, Croatian government is firmly obliged to defend the truth that we all know – Croatia was attacked and it had right to defense and we won in that imposed war,” said Sanader. (JL, 28 Mar 07)

"We"?

What did he fight for? PM Sanader gave “full support” to President Mesic who shipped the top secret transcripts to The Hague and has sent the journalist in The Hague's prison for having published his name in connection with this dirty affair.

Of course, Mesic shipped off these documents after he “polished” them. It took a year to Mesic to launch his delivery even though  - Sanader was on Mars at the time as well - Mesic was giving a clear impression in 1999/2000 that he couldn’t wait for it.  

Not so long ago, PM Sanader himself and his government confirmed the authenticity of an especially compromising transcript (Brijuni transcripts) in spite of multiple evidence proving that it was forged. So much about “the latest developments!” 

“Croatian government does everything [in its power] to present the truth about the Homeland war to the world and The Hague. We will insist that Croatia gets the opportunity to bring up the truth about that war, within the rules of the International tribunal at the Hague,” said the prime minister Ivo Sanader. (Index, 28 Mar 2007)

Croatia had the "opportunity." Croatia had won the war against Milosevic et al.

What a “development” – when we all know that the PM has done everything indeed to extradite Croatian generals to The Hague – for defending their country. So he insisted and Croatia has already “got the opportunity" to be falsly accused. The problem is that the innocent people are in prison, in The Hague and in Croatia, and not these traitors who broke Croatian Constitution.

News but no news. Except for Croatia’s PM falling from Mars.  

As for Cicak’s "Sanader et al’s Croatia” (see previous articles, please)  – lunatic Cicak (and I'm saying 'lunatic' just because he said he was a lunatic) knows he has lost his argument about Croatia’s guilt for defense in front of all normal people of Croatia and elsewhere.

"The latest development" is that Cicak tries to blame General Gotovina for having taken part in "the French colonial politics." Thus Cicak wouldn’t trade places with general Gotovina in spite of all the glory of the latter, because “while Gotovina was vagabonding in the French Legion to carry out French colonial politics, I was….” doing something “for today’s freedom” of Croatia. (JL, 24 Mar 07) .... only to do his best ever since to sabotage Croatia’s freedom. Well, Cicak was in prison for a while, during ex-Yugoslavia, and the story goes that he was implanted there by the communist secret services, judging by the comments to his attacks on Croatian generals in Croatia, and not just by that.

Now, both Cicak and Sanader "liberated" Croatia. They betrayed Croatia.

What to do with all these sudden “liberators” of Croatia falling from Mars… There were nowhere in the 1990s. Where there was no so much Croatian blood on the Earth in the 1990s, we'd have perhaps believed in their lunatic statements...

Democracy Blog iskreno zahvaljuje uredništvu Hrvatskog kulturnog vijeća u HRVATSKOJ što su prenijeli komentar "Tko je rekao da nema života na Marsu?" na svom portalu HKV.

NAJNOVIJI RAZVOJ DOGAĐAJA:

Tko je rekao da nema života na Marsu?

LT, 29. 03. 2007.

Tko je rekao da nema života na Marsu? Hrvatski premijer Ivo Sanader upravo je pao s Marsa te komentira "najnoviji razvoj događaja" oko haaških optužbi protiv hrvatskih generala i Hrvatske (Oluja).

Pitanje što misli o transkriptima koji su "mrčeni" (da pozajmim Čičkov balkanski rječnik) u Uredu predsjednika, te na kojima se temelje haaške optužbe za "zločinački pothvat" Hrvatske (i generala Ante Gotovine, među inim) pri kojem je oslobođena 1/3 okupiranog hrvatskog teritorija, veliki kazališni dečko Sanader zapravo neće komentirati, ali će uzeti zasluge za hrvatsku slobodu:

"Neću komentirati ovaj najnoviji razvoj događaja, ali u svakom slučaju, ostaje čvrsta obveza Vlade da se obrani istina koju svi znamo - Hrvatska je bila napadnuta, imala je pravo na obranu i pobijedili smo u tom nametnutom ratu", izjavio je Sanader. (JL, 28. 03. 07)

Mi smo pobijedili? Tko?

Za što se on borio? Premijer Sanader dao "punu podršku" predsjedniku Mesiću koji je poslao u Haag transkripte s pečatom najstrože državne tajne a potom i novinara koji je objavio njegovo ime u svezi tog prljavog posla.

Naravno, Mesić je odaslao te dokumente nakon što ih je dobro "uredio." Mesiću je uzelo godinu dana za tu isporuku premda - Sanader i tada bijaše na Marsu - Mesić je ostavljao u 1999. i 2000. jasan dojam da nije mogao čekati taj trenutak.

Ne tako davno, premijer Sanader i njegova vlada sami su potvrdili autentičnost nadasve kompromitirajućih Brijunskih transkripta unatoč višestrukim dokazima da su isti falsificirani. Toliko o "najnovijem razvoju događaja."

"Hrvatska Vlada čini sve da se svijetu te Međunarodnom sudu u Haagu predoči istina o Domovinskom ratu. Inzistirat ćemo da Hrvatska dobije prigodu iznijeti istinu o tom ratu, a u sklopu pravila koja ima Međunarodni sud u Haagu", kazao je premijer Ivo Sanader. (Index, 28. 03. 2007).  

Hrvatska je imala prigodu. Hrvatska je bila pobijedila Miloševića i drugove mu.

Kakav "razvoj" - a zna se da je premijer uistinu učinio sve da isporuči hrvatske generale Haagu - za obranu domovine. Toliko je inzistirao da je Hrvatska sad dobila prigodu biti lažno optuživana. Problem je u tome što su zatvoreni nevini ljudi a ne izdajice koje su prekršile hrvatski Ustav.

Dakle ništa novo. Izuzev što je hrvatski premijer pao s Marsa.

A glede Čičkove "Sanaderove" Hrvatske i čije li još (molim pogledajte prethodne komentare) - lunatik Čičak (a kažem 'lunatik' zato što je on to rekao za se), lunatik dakle zna da je izgubio raspravu o hrvatskoj krivnji za obranu domovine pred normalnim svijetom u Hrvatskoj i drugdje.

"Najnoviji razvoj" je to što Čičak pokušava kriviti generala Gotovinu za sudjelovanje u "francuskoj kolonijalnoj politici." Ne bi se Čičak s njim mijenjao "jer, dok se Gotovina vucarao po Legiji stranaca upregnut u jaram francuske kolonijelne politike, ja sam..." bavio se nečim "za današnju slobodu" Hrvatske. (JL, 24. 03. 07) Fino, Čičak je bio u zatvoru za bivše Jugoslavije ali izgleda su ga tu bile ubacile komunističke tajne službe, sudeći po komentarima na njegove ispade protiv hrvatskih generala, i ne samo po tome.

I Čičak i Sanader su sad "oslobodili" Hrvatsku. Izdali su Hrvatsku.

Što ćemo sa svim ovim "osloboditeljima" Hrvatske odjedanput što nam padaju iz vedra neba, s Marsa. Nigdje ih nije bilo u ratnim 90-tim. Da nije bilo toliko hrvatske krvi na Zemlji u 90-tim, možda bismo i povjerovali u njihove lunatične izjave.

Sanader: Tko će me, ah, tko će me konačno, muški ?

 Diana Majhen

02. studenog 2007.

Čitajući članak Ivane Arapović pod naslovom “Natrag  pederi u spamfighter” čovjek se doista mora  zapitati kakva to vrsta ljudi propagira HDZ i premijera Sanadera na ovakav način.

Da sam na njegovom mjestu odavno bih shvatila da mi ovakvi ljudi i ovakvi potezi nanose ogromnu štetu. Jer, pišući u slavu i čast HDZ-a, kroz njihove upise ljudi gledaju i samu stranku, pa i samog premijera.

Ono što mogu vidjeti u većini tih upisa doista je raznoliko, ali ne služi na slavu i hvalu stranci koju tako gorljivo zastupaju na net-u: polupismenost, bahatost, nedostatak bilo kakve uljudjene komunikacije, mržnja prema ženama, prijetnje neistomišljenicima, etc…

I povrh svega toga, laži, laži i stalno laži.

Za ovo posljednje, dobro. Prisjetivši se Sanaderovog govora na Splitskoj rivi, doista čovjek ne može okriviti njegove sljedbenike ako lažu. Imali su od koga i učiti.

Ali po pitanju ostalih stvari, možda bi bilo dobro da netko objasni HDZ-ovim vodećim kadrovima kako pisanje njihovih agitatora po net-u ostavlja potpuno suprotan dojam od onoga kojem se teži.

Poruka bi bila nekako u ovom stilu “Ako želite da vam na vlast dodju primitivni, lažljivi ljudi, koji će vas silom, pod prijetnjama, tjerati da radite ono što ne želite, koji će vas vrijedjati, te neće birati sredstva uključujući tu i vašu obitelj kako bi postigli ono što žele, glasajte za HDZ."

Da li je to ono što želi premijer Sanader?

Po pitanju pedera, ne bih se izjašnjavala.

Za kraj, jedna pjesmica našeg premijera, koju je napisao prije dvadesetak godina i mislim da je doista šteta što nismo bili ranije upoznati sa njegovim literalnim ostvarenjima:

 Ivo Sanader:

 Nenia Salonitana

                     za J.P.

Dosta mi je polovnjaka.

Hoću, konačno, muški da me se.

Balkanski, štono riječ.

I to: sada. Odmah. Nunc at numquam.

Dosta mi je polovnjaka.

Tko će me, ah, tko će me konačno, muški?

Drhćem uzbuđena. Zakoraknuti u povijest?

Quid multa? Muškarčinu čekam. Dokrajči!

Dosta mi je polovnjaka.

Numerus Negidius. Prekini, konačno,

agoniju.

Dosadni niz historijskih zelembaća.

Faex populi.

Čekaj s asfaltom. Iskorijeni najprije.

Dosta mi je polovnjaka.

Od Avara do danas. Iskrči sve, konačno.

O, sancta simplicitas. Muški me dohvati!

Ne dvoumi. Iščupaj. Ob maiorem cautelam.

Dosta mi je polovnjaka

Po peti put. Po tko zna koji put. Konačno:

Svrši!!!O fictus possessor. U spomen:

Mojim imenom cestu nazovi.

Nuper obijt.

Javno

Slike-dokumenti

Književnici sasjekli Sanaderovu pjesmu

Diana Majhen

Cicak in "European, Racan's and Sanader's Croatia" calls for murder?

LT, 19 Mar.2007

Lunatic Čičak has also «discovered» that general «Gotovina is behind everything» his defense team is doing.

What a communist "discovery" - who was behind till now, who should be behind his defence?

«Mišetić is too transparent – said Cicak – convinced that Gen Gotovina is behind the reaction (to Cicak's attack on Gen Gotovina) signed by Misetic. In fact, both of them, both of them! [here Cicak goes beserk] Misetic was just tinting the paper officially, he's just a typewriter, says Cicak». (SD, 18 Mar 2007)

How does Cicak possibly know any of this? Is he listening to the conversation between Gen Gotovina and his defense? Can he prove what General Gotovina is saying in prison? He should be asked to.

More importantly, why does Cicak panic in this way in response to Misetic's announcement that he «will get the opportunity to test the validity of his information, informants and those who were trading the documents for him before the relevant court.» (Cicak sent Gen Cermak in prison in this way.)

And why is now Cicak responding with a famous Croatian military expression  «Both of them, both of them!» (Obadva, obadva!) when he's offered to settle the matter at the court, and determine the truth? In his game, Cicak should be a «legalist» after all, it's not the war.

Hence, why, «Obadva, obadva»? When in 1991, Yugoslav Army under Milosevic's general Kadijevic was bombing Croatian city of Sibenik, and the two ennemy bombers were hit in one shut by Croatian anti-aircraft defense system (21 Sep 1991). «Obadva, obadva, oba su pala!» (Both, both, they both fell!) - has become a cry of hope among Croatian forces and Croatian people, a tiny hope that Yugoslav army's bombing can be stopped. Obadva, obadva, oba su pala, a spontanious cry from the attacked Croatia, was filmed and passed around Croatia and the whole world, Croatia wouldn't surrender. And still there was no help to stop Milosevic's aggression, until 1995.

Cicak seems to be still taking it hard. He's perverting the famous expression out of fear that a fair examination of the documantation and his forgeries at the court wouldn't produce a desired effect. Would he murder General Gotovina if he cannont prove him guilty?

Obviously, Cicak fears that the documentation, much of it being repoduced by and even bought from Serbs in Banja Luka by the very Croatian government, wouldn't be enought credible to produce a desired «guilty» verdict against General Gotovina. He treatens to «publish the transcripts» alter having sent the tones of transctipts in the Hague together with Mesic, Racan and Sanader. In any case,  he wants vengence against «Obadva, obadva» to be sure...

In Cicak's «European, Sanader's and Racan's Croatia» (as if Croatia wasn't located in Europe prior to them) it is probably not normal that the lawyers be in accord with their defendent. It's not how communist «justice» used to operate in Croatia. Misetic is «transparent» for he didn't follow the old rule, even though it is General Gotovina's «fault». Who should he work for?

What game has Cicak lost so to go public with such lunatic statements of his? Was Misetic expected to «tint the paper» with something Čičak was behind.

Yes, obadva, obadva, swallow it, glutton Cicak, once for all – because Croatia still echoes, «stop the war in Croatia», «stop the bombing»! General Gotovina and his forces did stop it at the end. This is why he's «behind everything».

May God protect Gen Gotovina from Cicak's maddness and hatred.

(Please see previous article Bastards! for more on this subject)

Čičak u "europskoj, Sanaderovoj i Račanovoj Hrvatskoj" poziva na ubojstvo?

LT, 19. 03. 2007

Lunatik Čičak je također "otkrio" da je iza "svega [general] Gotovina" što njegov odvjetnički tim radi.

Kakvo komunističko "okriće" - a tko je dosad bio iza svega, tko bi trebao biti iza njegove obrane?

"Mišetić je previše providna osoba - kaže Čičak, uvjeren, međutim, da iza reagiranja koje potpisuje Mišetić stoji general Gotovina. Odnosno, "obadva, obadva. - Mišetić je oficijelno samo 'mrčio hartiju', on je tek pisar - kaže Čičak." (SD, 18. 03. 2007)

Kako je moguće da Čičak o tome nešto zna? Jeli on prisluškuje razgovore između generala Gotovine i njegove obrane? Može li dokazati što general Gotovina govori u zatvoru? Trebalo bi to tražiti od njega.

Bitnije, zašto Čičak paniči na taj način u odgovoru na Mišetićevu najavu da će isti "uskoro imati prigodu testirati vjerodostojnost svojih informacija, informatora i onih koji su mu dilali dokumente pred nadležnim sudom". (Čičak je na taj način poslao gen. Čermaka u zatvor.)

I zašto Čičak sad odgovara na to glasovitim vojnim pokličem Hrvatske vojske, "obadva, obadva" kad mu se nudi prilika da se spor riješi i istina utvrdi na sudu. U svojoj igri, Čičak bi trebao igrati "legalista" zar ne, nije rat.

Zašto dakle "obadva, obadva"? Kad je 1991 Jugoslavenska vojska pod zapovjedništvom Miloševićeva generala Kadijevića bombardirala hrvatski grad Šibenik, šibenska protuzračna obrana u jednom trenutku srušila je 2 neprijateljska zrakoplova (21. 9. 1991.) Obadva, obadva, oba su pala! - postao je izraz nade HV-a i hrvatskog naroda, tanke nade da se bombadiranja jugoslavenske vojske mogu zaustaviti. Obadva, obadva, oba su pala! - spontani krik iz napadnute Hrvatske je snimljen i poslan diljem Hrvatske i svijeta, Hrvatska se neće predati. I još uvijek nije bilo pomoći protiv Miloševićeve agresije, do 1995.
 

Čičku to izgleda još teško pada. On izokreće značenje glasovitog krika iz straha da pošteno istraživanje dokumentacije i njegovih falsifikata ne će proizvesti željeni učinak. Jeli bi on ubio generala Gotovinu ako mu ne može dokazati da je kriv?

Očito, Čička brine da dokumentacija, od koje je dosta toga i sama hrvatska vlada čak kupila od Srba iz Banja Luke što su je reproducirali, ne će biti dostatna da proizvede presudu o krivnji generala Gotovine. Prijeti da će objaviti još transkripta, nakon što su ih na tone poslali - Mesić, Račan i Sanader - u Haag. Ali za svaki slučaj, traži osvetu protiv "obadva, obadva," da bude siguran...

U Čičkovoj, "European's, Sanader's and Racan's Croatia" (kao da se Hrvatska nije nalazila u Europi prije njih), vjerojatno nije normalno da odvjetnici rade u suglasnosti sa svojim branjenikom. To je neobično za funkcioniranje komunističke "pravde" u Hrvatskoj. Mišetić je "providan" jer ne slijedi staro komunističko pravilo, ali to je "krivnja" generala Gotovine. Za koga bi on trebao raditi?

Kakvu je igru Čičak izgubio da je izišao u javnost s takvim lunatičnim izjavama? Jeli Mišetić trebao "mrčiti hartiju" nećim iza čega bi bio Čičak?

Da, obadva, obadva, progutaj to, proždrljivi Čičak, jedanput za sva vremena - jer Hrvatska još odzvanja "zaustavite rat u Hrvatskoj," "zaustavite bombardiranja!"  General Gotovina ih je zaustavio s hrvatskom vojskom nakraju. Zato je "iza svega Gotovina."

Nek Bog čuva generala Gotovinu od Čičkovog ludila i mržnje.

(više o ovoj temi pročitajte u prethodnom članku Banda)

Bastards, bastards !

LT, 18 Mar 2007

PM Sanader has just removed the plaque deposed in Sinj (Alka) by General Ante Gotovina.

The traditional knigt turnament Alka which gave that honour to Gen Gotovina, is a symblol of Croatian resistence and victory, held in Sinj since 1715 to commemorate the victory over Ottoman Turk invaders.

Sanader wants to put his own plaque instead, he whose government has virtually imprisoned and extradited him and most of Croatian Homeland War heroes at foreign or domestic prisons. (JL, 17 Mar 2007 - hr)

Previously, Sanader announced that he and the "opposition" made an agreement not to make General Gotovina (or the Hague's tribunal) an issue on the next election.

Of course not, Sanader and his diplomacy took the "credit" for arresting Croatian General before all foreign governments to "prove their [continuous communist] credibility." (Embassy of the Republic of Croatia in the US - WEEKLY BULLETIN, Dec 8) What would they say to Croatian people?

Also, Sanader keeps in prison the Duke of Sinj General Mirko Norac who distinguished himself in fighting against the Yugoslav Communist Army and Serbian Chetnick during their aggression against Croatia.

No, Sanader is not the only one infected by communist treason virus, there's Djapic too: The movie is being on about him. Sedlar made the film about Djapic" in Israeli production (will this add up something to his "credibility") and will be shown in New York City, Zagreb, Osijek and Tel Aviv.  What are the deeds Djapic has accomplished so to become so "famous" apart from being HDZ's secret marionette; and as HDZ changed the master, so he did too?

Both Sanader (HDZ) and Djapic (HSP) rose to power in Croatia with their mouth full of defending Croatian Generals, but they used it, obviously, only to get the maneuvering space for the treason. Is it why they're so welcome by "world governments" while honorable men to whom Croatia owes its freedom are to be in prison, without ever telling them how wrong it is to put innocent Croatian Generals in prison, and let communists rule.

Sure they will even "defend the generals" - Gen Gotovina in particular - only to make "progress" along the old communist rules: "The prosecutor is accusing you, the prosecutor is trying you" to " the prosecutor is defending you" too.

But Djapic will be "wiser" and "wait for the Serbs to take over 'Krajina'" that was liberated in Oluja 1995, so to overtake power (this is his wise plan against opposition!), and meanwhile, he plays in the movies, he will play an important role in this year's elections too, so to assure the continuity of the treason of Croatia - will he not?

And will this be enough to round up the treason for now?

Obviously not: Lunatic Ivan Zvonimir Cicak supposedly defends "European, Sanader's and Racan's Croatia" in his report on "Gotovina's game". Mind you, gen Gotovina is an innocent man and in prison! And he "plays" according to Cicak, "a merciless game." Cicak has been indeed merciless in his judgment, and irrational in his fear. Gen Gotovina who won the war against communism and Milosevic, who was also a Western soldier in French Leagon (and due to his ability and professionalism, the West now asks Croatian soldiers to Irak and Afghanistan!), is suddenly the "symbol of resistance to the modern Croatian state of  law, whose picture is used  by the opponents of European, and Sanader's and Racan's Croatia. He's, according to my information, convinced that he's God given leader of united Croatian right parties, what he will operationally become once he's freed from the verdict, into which he's deeply convinced," concludes Cicak. 

Since when "Sanader's and  Racan's" communist Croatia became modern again?

Cicak confirms political motivation behind Gen Gotovina's indictement. 90 % of Croatian population celebrates Gen Gotovina as a hero, are they all "right-wing"? Is everyone who's not a genuine former or actual communist - a part of a "right wing."

Is this what "democracy" came to in Croatia.

As for "European Croatia", Cicak is tasked with criminalizing Gen Gotovina's European past of French legionnaire. He criticizes media too for giving the space to other victims of Croatian treason, such as Gen Norac.

Cicak is not satisfied with falsely criminalizing Croatian generals and unjustly imprisoning them; what more is he asking for? A catastrophe!

And strangely enough,  Cicak knows (?) what Gen Gotovina is saying to his unfortunate mates in the prison, and what he's "deeply convinced" into!

As for Cicak's credentials......I don't know about them. The name of this bastard of Cicak I heard more closely in the late 1990s only in a bank near Economic Institute in Zagreb (near Kennedyjev trg) while he was making financial transactions with incredibly large sums of money, much to the wonder of the clients around him, and my own, it couldn't  go unnoticed.

Otherwise, Cicak admitted - in the same column of his - to be a "lunatic due to meteoric craziness.... no usual medication helps there"! Possible, but isn't he sick for money, power; come on, we're not in a science fiction world here.

What's their game? Is Croatia theirs, and what kind of Croatia is it if its liberators are not welcome there.

The honor is not something that can be bought or sold, or taken away by force, like a plaque in Sinj. It has to be earned, and these guys so used to living on other people's work and suffering can never earn it.

Anyhow, we shouldn't be surprised that they still fear General Gotovina, even though they've ruined his life - a life of an innocent man who only loved and defended Croatia. They fear Croatia for all evil they have done.

Cicak is right about one thing: General Gotovina is a leader, wherever he may be. His free Croatia lives in all of us! 90% of Croatian people at least!

Run after communist Tito's and Milosevic's general Kadijevic who was distroying Vukovar and other Croatian cities, not after those who defeated them. And after many such -  if you're not communists or traitors. And mind you, the iron fence fell, bastards.

Is their anything else? Yeah, I wouldn't like to interfere with this, but I wonder how come general Zagorec bought his liberty for 1 million euros in Austria. (JL, 16 Mar 2007) Some will use his case for a "higher goal" of criminalizing Croatia's defense war, but it won't be quite so. Not all generals in Croatia were generals. If all of them were generals, they would have won the battle against the treason, our heroes wouldn't be in prison; some didn't even try to fight, and they are paying, and will be paying for that - same as Mesić run away from Belgrade in "fićo" (mini car)  so to sell himself to Croatians, and now he runs Belgrade's communist politics in Zagreb. 

My generals, your poor trooper  wonders: Are you really less able than we are, are you more scared than we are. I'm worried about Croatia then! And what can you lose?

So we learn, Croatian Generals in HDZ's (Sanader's) team are not satisfied with the cooperation with the governemnt. (Jl, 15 Mar 2007). Some problems with volunteers' registers, the points, the money...

How much "justice" and "honor" can the money buy, if they allowed all this.

Gen Gotovina defense team however claims to cooperate well with the government (response to Cicak).

Now we should really ask Cicak and "Sanader's and Racan's Croatia" what game are they playing. (They're still talking about themselves!)

By the way, have they ever talked to Croatian soldiers from the Storm 1995 who were telling people how many houses the Serbs/Chetnicks and Yugoslav army set on fire while withdrawing. I never read more about this in Croatian media, but Cicak mentions such excerpts, probably as an "evidence" against Croatian general (for his "command responsibility")! Who did it?

Well, I'd be ashamed to translate all this in my mother - Croatian -tongue but at least I'm on a safe side with Yugoslav secret service translations in a foreign language. I remember horrible and inversed translations they were doing en direct for foreign authorities and media during Oluja 1995 only to blacken each Croatian success on the way to freedom and peace. It took a while till some were replaced... One never knows with their "diplomacy" - they're openly back to their shameful work. What can they do, Belgrade doesn't want them any more. And Croatia does!? Sanader was their pupil, Mesic their masterslave, and they're infecting the winning generation by the same old communist habits. Bastards.

Banda !

LT, 18.03.2007

Premijer Sanader otklonio je kamen temeljac za gradnju Alkarskih dvora u Sinju koji je postavio General Gotovina.

Viteško alkarsko društvo koje je dalo tu čast generalu Gotovini, tradicionalno obilježava Alku, simbol hrvatskog otpora i pobjede nad otomanskim osvajačima još od 1715.

Sanader želi postaviti svoj vlastiti kamen, a praktično su on i njegova vlada zatvorili ili izručili generala Gotovinu i većinu heroja domovinskog rata u stranim i domaćim zatvorima. (JL, 17.03. 2007)

Ranije je Sanader najavio da je sklopio sporazum s "oporbom" da general Gotovina (ili haaški tribunal) neće biti tema sljedećih izbora.

Naravno da ne će, Sanader i njegova diplomacija sebi su pripisali zasluge za uhićenje Generala Gotovine pred stranim vladama kako bi "dokazali svoj (kontinuirani komunistički) kredibilitet. (U biltenu hrvatskog veleposlanstva u Washingtonu DC, 8. 12.2006) Što bi o tom rekli hrvatskom narodu?

Također Sanader drži u zatvoru Alkarskog vojvodu generala Mirka Norca koji se istaknuo u borbi protiv jugoslavensko-komunističke i četničke agresije na Hrvatsku.

Ne, Sanader nije jedini koji je zaražen virusom komunističke izdaje, ima Đapića također: Sedlar snimio film o Đapiću u izraelskoj produkciji (hoće li mu to dati što na kredibilitetu) koji se prikazuje u New Yorku, Zagrebu, Osijeku i Tel Avivu. Koje su zasluge Đapića da je postao tako "slavan" osim što je bio potajna marioneta HDZ-a; i kad je HDZ promijenio gospodara, onda je i on tako učinio?

I Sanader (HDZ) i Đapić došli su na vlast s ustima punim obrane hrvatskih generala, ali su to očito iskoristili kao "manevarski prostor" za izdaju. Jesu li zato dobrodošli pred "svjetskim vladarima" dok časni ljudi kojima Hrvatska duguje slobodu imaju ići u zatvore, a da im nikad nisu rekli koliko je pogrešno zatvarati nevine hrvatske generale da bi komunisti vladali.

Naravno, oni će čak i "braniti generale" - posebice generala Gotovinu - samo da "usavrše" komunističko pravilo "kadija te tuži, kadija te sudi" do "kadija te i brani."

Ali Đapić će biti "mudriji" i "čekati da Srbi preuzmu 'Krajinu'" što je oslobođena u Oluji 1995, da bi preuzeo vlast (to je njegov mudri plan protiv oporbe!), a u međuvremenu će igrati važnu ulogu u filmovima, na ovogodišnjim izborima nebili osigurao izdaju Hrvatske, zar ne?

Hoće li to biti dosta zasada da se zaokruži izdaja?

Očito ne će. Lunatik Ivan Zvonimir Čičak navodno brani "europsku, Sanaderovu i Račanovu Hrvatsku" u svom izvješću o "Gotovininoj igri." Da se podsjetimo, general Gotovina je nevin čovjek i u zatvoru! I on "vodi bespoštedne borbe." Čičak je doista bespoštedan u svojoj presudi, i nerazuman u svom strahu. General Gotovina koji je dobio rat protiv komunizma i Miloševića, koji je također služio u Francuskoj legiji stranaca (i zahvaljujući njegovoj sposobnosti i profesionalizmu, Zapad sad traži hrvatske vojnike u Afganistan i Irak!), odjedanput je "simbol otpora modernoj, pravnoj hrvatskoj državi, čijom se slikom koriste protivnici europske, i Sanaderove i Račanove, Hrvatske. On je, prema mojim informacijama, sam sve više uvjeren kako je bogomdani i odabrani novi lider ujedinjene hrvatske desnice, što će i operativno postati onog trenutka kada bude oslobođen optužbe, u što je on duboko uvjeren," zaključuje Čičak.

Odkad je to "Sanaderova i Račanova" komunistička Hrvatska postala opet "moderna"?

Čičak potvrđuje političku pozadinu optužnice protiv generala Gotovine. 90% hrvatskog naroda slavi gen. Gotovinu kao heroja, jesu li svi oni "desnica"? Jeli svatko tko nije genuini komunist, bivši ili današnji, član "desnice"?

Na to je pala "demokracija" u Hrvatskoj.

Kad o "europskoj" Hrvatskoj, Čičak se uposlio u kriminalizaciju generalove europske prošlosti u francuskoj legiji. Jednako kritizira medije što daju prostor drugim žrtvama hrvatske izdaje, primjerice generalu Norcu.

Čičak nije zadovoljen lažnom kriminalizacijom hrvatskih generala i nepravednim zatvaranjima; što on još želi? Katastrofa!

Dostatno čudno, Čičak zna (?) što general Gotovina govori nesretnim zatvorenicima u zatvoru i u što je on "duboko uvjeren."

Kad o Čičkovom kredibilitetu... ne znam o tome ništa. Ime tog bandita Čičak moglo se izbliza čuti jedanput u kasnim 90-tim u banki blizu Ekonomskog instituta u Zagrebu (kod Kennedyevog trga) dok je obavljao financijske transakcije s golemim sumama novca, što se činilo nevjerojatno klijentima oko njega kao i meni; to se nije moglo ne zapaziti.

Osim toga, Čičak sam priznaje - u istoj svojoj kolumni - da je posao "lunatik u meteoropatskom ludilu" i da tu ne pomaže "uobičajena medicina." Moguće, ali nije li on bolestan za novcem i vlasti; ma haj'te, nismo u svijetu znanstvenih fikcija.

Kakva je njihova igra? Jeli Hrvatska samo njihova, i kakva je to Hrvatska u koju nisu dobrodošli njezini osloboditelji.

Čast je nešto što se ne kupuje ili prodaje, i ne može se oduzeti silom, kao kamen temeljac u Sinju. Treba je zaraditi, a ovi tipovi koji su naučili živjeti na tuđem radu i patnji nikad je ne mogu zaraditi.

Svakako ne treba iznenaditi što strahuju od Generala Gotovine, premda su mu uništili život - život nevinog čovjeka koji je samo branio i volio Hrvatsku. Strahuju od Hrvatske za sve zlo što su činili.

Čičak je u pravu u jednoj stvari: General Gotovina je lider ma gdje bio. Njegova slobodna Hrvatska živi u svima nama! Barem u 90% hrvatskog naroda!

Nek proganjaju Titinog i Miloševićevog generala Kadijevića što je razarao Vukovar i druge hrvatske gradove, a ne one koji su ih porazili u ratu. I puno takvih - ako nisu izdajice i komunisti. I da ih podsjetimo bandu, željezna zavjesa je pala!

Ima li još nešto? Ima, ne bih se u ovo miješal' ali čudi kako je general Zagorec kupio svoju slobodu za milijun eura. (JL, 16. 03. 2007) Neki hoće iskoristiti taj slučaj za obeščašćivanje domovinskog obrambenog rata ali ne će ići baš tako. Nisu svi generali u Hrvatskoj bili generali. Da su svi bili generali, dobili bi bitku protiv izdaje, naši heroji ne bi bili u zatvoru. Neki se nisu ni pokušali boriti, i plaćaju za to, i plaćat će - kao što je i Mesić iz Beograda bježao u fići, čime se osobno hvalio 1991. ne bili se dodvorio Hrvatima a sad u Zagrebu vodi beogradsku komunističku politiku.

Generali naši, vaš jadni vojnik se čudi: Jeste li manje sposobni ili više uplašeni nego mi. U tom slučaju brinem za Hrvatsku! I što možete izgubiti?

Tako doznajemo da su Generali iz HDZ-ova tima za branitelje nezadovoljni suradnjom s Vladom. (JL, 15.03.2007) Neki problemi s registrima branitelja, bodovima, novcem..

Koliko "pravde" i "časti" može novac kupiti, ako su dopustili sve ovo.

Odvjetnički tim generala Gotovine tvrdi da dobro surađuje s vladom (u odgovoru Čičku).

Sad bismo se stvarno trebali upitati kakvu igru igraju Čičak i "Sanaderova i Račanova Hrvatska." (Još uvijek govore o sebi!)

Usput, jesu li ikad razgovarali s hrvatskim vojnicima iz Oluje 1995 koji su govorili narodu koliko kuća su Srbi/Četnici i JNA spalili pri povlačenju. Nikad o tome ne čitam u medijima, ali Čičak spominje takve "transkripte" koje nudi kao dokaz protiv hrvatskog generala (zbog "zapovjedne odgovornosti")! Tko je to učinio?

Bilo mi je teško sve ovo napisati na mom maternjem - hrvatskom - jeziku misleći da je dosta to reći na engleskom, i tako se osiguram od prijevoda na strani jezik od strane jugoslavenskih tajnih službi. Sjećam se strašnih, iskrivljenih prijevoda koje su potonji obavljali za strane predstavnike vlasti i medija tijekom Oluje 1995 samo da bi oblatili svako hrvatsko napredovanje prema slobodi i miru. Uzelo je nešto vremena da se neki zamijene.... Nikad se ne zna s njihovom "diplomacijom" - otvoreno su se dali na svoj stari sramotni posao. I što će drugo, Beograd ih ne će. A Hrvatska hoće? Sanader je bio njihov učenik a Mesić na čelu te sluganske klike, i sad zaražavaju i pobjedničku generaciju istim starim komunističkim navikama. Banda.

The “secrets” of Croatian diplomacy and politics made public

(CROATIA – WWI ; Croatian mothers – Human rights ; Croatia – Italy scandal ; Croatia – ICTY / EU ; Croatia, Ah Croatia….)

LT, 04 Mar 2007

The absurd of modern times: Croatia and Croatian best soldiers of the Homeland war are falsely accused for the “crimes” of defending their homeland, their neighbors and their homes.

Croatian president and the government remain meek – if not protective - towards communist and chetnik/Serbian/Yugoslav army crimes, the final goal of which is to reverse the historical truth.

They’ve been experienced at this via their communist formation, but secret-minded as they may wish to be, they’re transparent: Mostly, they’re the enemies of Croatia; in some milder cases, their entire politics are run by Croatian enemies; and in still milder cases, they collaborate with the enemies making impossible compromises that ruin Croatia. In each case, it is a horror that calls for a true catastrophe.

“Croatian” diplomacy by deception, still reposing on old communist precepts (judging from all that’s accomplished so far), subtly kneels before false gods into withdrawal of Croatia’s accusation for genocide against Serbia, before even discussing it at the ICTY (Ivan Simonovic - hr). This issue would be negotiated secretly – with whom? Not with Croatian victims, to be sure.

Here’s a guidance provided by the “one of the most prominent Croatian political analysts” Davor Gjenero. (Is he “prominent for he campaigns for president Mesic and pro-Yugoslav/-Serbian groups such as “stina” from Split? See “stina” profile in English too, originally established by G. Soros’s Open Society).

Gjenero has emptied against Croatia all ammunition of communist era, so he seeks a justification and a cover-up for Serbian crimes in the WW I. Here he comments the failure of Bosnia-Herzegovina’s accusation for genocide against Serbia (Srebrenica), and campaigns for the withdrawal of Croatia’s accusation against Serbia (Vukovar, Škabrnja, Voćin, Dubrovnik...) :

"It seems to me that the position publicly taken by professor Simonovic has been very thoughtful and reasonable. Croatia is in a serious trouble because it didn’t function as a normal state of law and order in the 1990s. Many processes have been developing without completed [defined] administrative [procedure]. I think that, regarding this verdict [in favour of Serbia] it’s important to stress the negative experience at the end of the WWI when the allocation of war reparations to Germany created the basis for creating a fascist majority. For this reason, the international powers are not inclined to making decision about the [Homeland 1991-95] war reparations payments [to Croatia],” says Gjenero for Index.

Perhaps Gjenero can explain why Serbs are given half of Bosnia-Herzegovina at the diplomatic table, following their military defeat in Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina (Operation Storm),  whilst once a large Croat population in Bosnia-Herzegovina fell to ever thin 10%!

And: About which international powers is Gjenero talking, about whose “fascism”? Only Serbia and Yugoslav army proved to be using fascist methods [en] nowadays in the sense that this term has been familiar to the world. (See also Myth and Reality, by McAdams.)

Gjenero, however, campaigns in favour of Serbia.  To him, "the war reparation payments [to Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia] would go in favor of radical parties," even though only in Serbia the largest  party in power is the Serbian radical party! 

Thus, Gjenero reveals the mechanism of treason:

"Some diplomatic processes should be run in silence. The government has the right to run secret negotiations, as well as the president of the state [of Croatia]. The [Croatian] foreign politics must be run smartly so to strengthen its continuity without having to change it as the party in power changes. It's not not good to be spreading the fire and force the government to take a [public] position [on the issue of genocide against Croatia] before the time is right. As long as the solutions are far away, we must leave to the government the space to manoeuvre, concludes Gjenero.” ( Index).

Indeed, Croatian foreign politics have remained essentially the same as the communist/Yugoslav foreign politics - "continuous."

Well, well… Since Croatia’s independence Gjenero and his international supporters insisted on transparency of Croatia’s politics in all domains, and look at them now! They're hiding, they're advising secrecy.

On another note, the “human right” activists accused even Croatian mothers (Bedem Ljubavi) for war mongering in the 1990s, for they 'transferred their sons from one army [Yugoslav/Serbian/communist] into the other [Croatian army],  you're not peacemakers, and that's the truth, you rose against the 1991 war [Serbian invasion on Croatia] but you didn't stop the war in 1995 [Operation Storm]". (Puhovski – hr at the “conference for the post war truth” that took place in Zagreb and hosted even the ICTY’s prosecutors of Croatia). The mothers’ association of course seeks justice against Puhovski’s insult on injury.

Yugoslav army and Serbian chetniks launched large-scale military attacks against Croatia following its declaration of independence at the 1st Croatian democratic elections in the early 1990s. Croatian mothers prayed for the peace and for the release of their sons from the Yugoslav armed forces (JNA), in which their sons happened to be serving a mandatory service just at the time of Croatia’s proclamation of independence. Should have Croatian mothers asked their Croatian sons to stay in the enemy armed forces, forced into the tanks, planes and on the front lines against their own people and homeland? Absurd! Yugoslav army was – secretly, of course – preparing for the attack against Croatia much before the war even started (SANU), hoping to smash Croatia within a couple of days. Some international forces gave them the 'green light' for such operations. (Please refer to